Bright Blue Energy Field Turbo Charge

Djwhalrp_djwhalKhul.jpg Khul here. Tashi Delek.

Alright. We’re going to work with a vibrant blue color. I would call it Smurf blue and this one is to sort of turbo charge the energy field.

I started to recommend it individually and I looked around and decided it is a good global color as well.

So to roll with the times, to be able to shift gears more quickly, and twists and turns that are Uranus-Pluto configurations create, and then also the Mercury retrograde we’re in and a few other things.

So a vibrant blue, Smurf blue. If you don’t know it, look it up. And feel that energy just rolling and rolling, kind of billowing out of the body. You want a very vibrant high energy field right now.

A very short message this week. Enjoy playing with the color.

As always, thank you and my love to you.

Djwhal Khul

SF Source Terri Newlon  Oct 16 2014

Scientific American Bashes GMO Labeling As ‘Unscientific’

“Public health lawyer Michele Simon agrees that the Scientific American piece had a familiar ‘biotech policy’ ring to it. In an email, Simon said, “It reads like the biotech industry handed Scientific American its talking points.”” – C Sarich

GMOFreeFloridaUnbiased science has clearly gone out the window when it comes to the GMO discussion. A somewhat recent pro-GMO editorial in Scientific American takes aim at labeling laws for genetically engineered foods, calling them “unscientific.” But proponents of non-GMO food and people’s right to know are saying that Scientific American is the one without a scientific leg to stand on.

The debate is over an article in the September 6th edition of the magazine wherein the editors claim that ‘it would be unsafe to give consumers the false impression that GMOs are unsafe.’ This comes at a time when labeling laws are being considered in 20 different states. The editors go on to say:

“The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has tested all the GMOs on the market to determine whether they are toxic or allergenic,” the editorial states. “They are not.”

Before I retort with the obvious – that the U.S. FDA is completely corrupted with Monsanto and biotech’s funny money, and therefore have no right to declare GMOs or any other drug or product as safe – have the editors not read the reports of numerous other scientists, including individuals from the biotech industry who say that GMO foods are highly toxic and incredibly damaging? Genetic engineers Dr. John Fagan, Dr Michael Antoniou, and researcher Claire Robinson have released a very exacting study of just how toxic these GE crops are – perhaps they should have a look-see. Continue reading

You Can Turn A $2000 Shipping Container Into An Epic Off-Grid Home

ShippingContainerOffGridLiving

What if you could spend a fraction of what it would cost to buy or build your own house and instead build a unique home that you could make completely off grid? It can be done and there’s a bunch of people who’ve done it already.

Shipping containers exist in a massive surplus and someone like you or I can grab one for around $2000. From there, you can get your creative juices flowing and build an awesome home, get away or cottage like structure on your existing property providing you have the space. If you’re able to put this baby on wheels, you won’t even need any form of permit to have it around.

Innovative ideas like this are getting popular as people seek alternate ways to like modern lifestyles. There is even a site called Zigloo who has released multiple plans and ideas for making structures out of shipping containers and more. You can check them out here.

Other Off-Grid Ideas Continue reading

You Are Nothing Conceivable Or Perceivable

BodyWithoutHeadYou are as much your body, your thoughts, or your feelings as you are a car, an apartment, or a pen!

When we say, “my car” or “my apartment” or “my pen,” we don’t mistake ourselves for the object. “My” is a possessive pronoun that indicates possession of an object. Something is claiming to have or possess something else. Yet, when it comes to “my body” or “my thoughts,” (due to conditioning, un-investigated assumptions and beliefs), we mistake (mis-take) our “body” and/or our “thoughts” as NOT another object/appearance that we seem to have, but rather who/what we literally are!? But this makes no sense, as the body ages, but do YOU? Thoughts come and go, but do YOU?

Again, if you say “my body,” your very words are indicating that it is NOT you, but rather something you seem to possess. You have a body, but it is not literally you. You have thoughts, but they are not literally you. This needs to be investigated deeply for oneself in order to see through the persistent, but ultimately illusory feeling/idea that you are your body/mind. (And the same thing applies to feelings and ideas, as in “my feeling” or “my idea.” Feelings and ideas are never you, but something you seem to temporarily have or possess.) Whatever the mind claims is “you” will ALWAYS be an object or appearance to YOU… including “the mind” itself. Continue reading