Telepathic Contact: Moon, Microwaves and Mind

ManETStarSkyNews from two sources this morning brought me again to the subject of telepathy. How does ESP, in particular telepathy work? How is it useful?

To answer these questions, the intention of your research matters. If your research is for developing weaponry, your end result is controlling human behavior. This would include diminishing as well as heightening telepathy. If your research is to understand human consciousness then your end result is advancement/refinement of innate human abilities. These two distinct schools of research may well be reaching the same scientific conclusions. Yet, how they use their conclusions is now the defining issue.

My first source came from Joseph Farrell and contextualizes scientific telepathic research for weaponry. Joseph wrote about the Department of Defense’s FOIA release of Eisenhower Briefing on MJ12, November 1952. (begins on page 449 and authenticity of document questioned) The Eisenhower briefing is buried in a 1966 document, OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE FOR PROJECT PANDORA MICROWAVE TEST FACILITY prepared by EV Byron.

Question: Was MJ 12 connected to Microwave research or was the Eisenhower file cleverly hidden in this document? If MJ12 is linked to microwaves, then is microwave-telepathic research also UFO reverse-engineered? Most likely, since researchers of reverse-engineered technology often cite microwave technology.

Continue reading

Eat More Healthy Fats. Here’s Why & How You Can Revolutionize Your Health

Increasing the amount of high quality fat, including saturated fat, in your diet may be the best thing you can do for your health. It’s time to put aside the low-fat diet schemes that have dominated the diet industry for over 40 years.

Sound, scientific research supports the reasonable consumption of healthy fats, including saturated fat, as part of a healthy lifestyle. This article takes a brief look at how we lost our way, what science now says about dietary fats, and which foods may be safely added to our diets.

How Did We Get Here?

In 1977 the USDA, through the National Advisory Committee on Nutritional Education (NACNE), recommended that Americans:

1 – Reduce total dietary fat to 30%

2 – Reduce saturated fat to 10% of total calories.

These recommendations were made without scientific, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) being performed to test their validity before being implemented. Furthermore, there were only five randomized trials of unhealthy men (no women) available to the committee at the time.  The committee was also heavily influenced by the now controversial and partially discredited Seven Countries Study of Ancel Keys which implicated saturated fat in cardiovascular disease.

Significantly, the rise in obesity corresponds with the publication of the government’s dietary standards:

Obesity

 

New Research

A recent meta-review of the 1977 recommendations appeared in the prestigious British Medical Journal’s OpenHeart and put them to rest. The authors, Harcombe, et al, concluded:

  • “It seems incomprehensible that dietary recommendations were introduced to 220 million US and 56 million UK citizens given the contrary results from a small number of unhealthy men.”
  • “The results of the present meta-analysis support the hypothesis that the available RCTs did not support the introduction of dietary fat recommendations in order to reduce CHD risk or related mortality.”
  • And that the dietary recommendations  “should not have been introduced.”

Implementing these dietary measures has been devastating. According to the CDC: “Between 1980 and 2000, obesity rates doubled among adults. About 60 million adults, or 30% of the adult population, are now obese.” Obesity rates continue to soar with Type 2 diabetes now at epidemic proportions.

What Does Current Nutrition Science Say About Saturated Fat?   

Much of current research paints a very different picture of the role of saturated fat in our diets. Let’s look briefly at four major studies that represent current thinking about dietary fat and specifically saturated fat.

Study 1 – The first study is a retrospective look at a trial completed in the early 1970s, the data from which had been lost. Dr. Christopher E. Ramden led an Australian and US team to evaluate “recovered data from the Sydney Diet Heart Study, a single blinded, parallel group, randomized controlled trial conducted in 1966-73; and an updated meta-analysis including these previously missing data.” The original study attempted to evaluate the effectiveness of replacing saturated fat with omega 6 linoleic acid, a vegetable oil. Participants included 458 men aged 30-59 who had experienced a recent coronary event.

Conclusion: “In this cohort, substituting dietary linoleic acid in place of saturated fats increased the rates of death from all causes, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular disease. An updated meta-analysis of linoleic acid intervention trials showed no evidence of cardiovascular benefit.”

Study 2 – In 2010 a meta-analysis of 21 prospective studies evaluated the association of saturated fat and cardiovascular disease. The results were published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and led by Patty W Siri-Tarino of the Children’s Hospital Oakland Research Institute.

Conclusion: “A meta-analysis of prospective epidemiologic studies showed that there is no significant evidence for concluding that dietary saturated fat is associated with an increased risk of CHD or CVD.” In other words, there is no verifiable link between eating saturated fat and the occurrence of coronary heart disease.

Study 3Cambridge scholar, Dr. Chowdhury, and an international research team in 2014, evaluated nearly 80 studies, including 27 randomized controlled trials (RCTs, the gold standard of scientific research) that involved half a million people. The research included not only what people reported they ate but measured the composition of fatty acids in their blood and fatty tissues.

Conclusion: The researchers found that “…current evidence does not support guidelines which restrict the consumption of saturated fats in order to prevent heart disease.” According to the NY Times: “The researchers did find a link between trans fats… and heart disease but ‘they found no evidence of dangers from saturated fat, or benefits from other kinds of fats.’”

Study 4 – In 2014, Dr. Jeff Volek, a professor of Human Sciences at Ohio State University, and his research team, recruited 16 adults, all of whom suffered from metabolic syndrome. Participants were fed diets that changed every three weeks up to 18 weeks. Every three weeks the amount of saturated fat was decreased and the amount of carbohydrates increased, and the amount of palmitoleic acid in the blood was measured. Palmitoleic acid has been linked to obesity, inflammation, insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, type 2 diabetes, heart disease and prostate cancer.

Conclusion: “When looking at palmitoleic acid… the scientists found that it consistently decreased on the high-fat/low-carb diet in all participants. The fatty acid then showed a step-wise increase in concentration in the blood as carbs were progressively added to the diet.”

In other words, as carbohydrates were added to the diet, levels of the deadly palmitoleic acid increased, thus heightening the risk of CVD.

Dr. Volek concluded: “There is widespread misunderstanding about saturated fat… there’s clearly no association of dietary saturated fat and heart disease, yet dietary guidelines continue to advocate restriction of saturated fat.”

What Have We Learned from These Scientific Studies?

  1. The 1977 dietary recommendations to limit saturated fat were not scientifically valididated
  2. There is no clear association between saturated fat and heart disease
  3. Trans fats (found in processed meats and foods, and vegetable oils) are linked to increased cardiovascular disease
  4. High fat/low carbohydrate diets lower dangerous levels of palmitoleic acid, which is associated with heart disease and other chronic diseases
  5. High levels of Omega 6 fatty acids in the form of linoleic vegetable oil showed no positive cardiovascular benefit.

What High-Fat Foods Should We Be Eating?

The following foods, some high in saturated fat, are healthy to consume as part of a natural, whole foods diet:

Avocado, tahini, dark chocolate, eggs, fatty fish, nuts, coconut, and liver. When combined with low carbohydrate foods, (spinach, broccoli, cauliflower, carrots, and others) coconut and olive oil, fresh fruits in moderation, and meat (preferably grass fed organic), a wholesome and healthy diet that guards against heart and other chronic diseases can be attained. Keep in mind that calories do count. It behooves us to eat reasonable portions as well as reduce carbohydrate levels in our diets. It’s both what we eat and how much we eat that matters.

*These foods are recommended given we are all driven towards various diet types and making healthier choices in each diet type is a step in the right direction.

A complete meal plan based on low carbohydrate and healthy fat intake can be found at Authority Nutrition.

Conclusion

Deciding on a diet best for you should be done with an awareness of current scientific thinking and in consultation with your physician or health provider. One diet does not fit all. The best diet for each of us is one that meets our individual needs.

The information in this article is not meant as medical advice and should be used for educational purposes only.


SF Source CollectiveEvolution  Feb 22 2015

Why Billionaire Oligarchs Bankroll Feminism

“The crux of the matter is, feminism and so-called “liberation” is useful to billionaire technocrats to reorganize society – it has nothing to do with liberation or freedom, but enslavement to the passions and ultimately, death through dysgenics and dying reproduction rates.” – Jay’s Analysis

I’ve received several messages from feminists of late inquiring as to why on earth I would dare to question women’s rights, supposed equality and empowerment. Having written a past article on the Satanic nature of feminism, the operant assumption by these questioners is of course guided by the official narrative of history as one of patriarchal oppression, wherein only in the last few centuries has the “tyranny” of old white men been exposed in the vast conspiracy theory known as gender. Of course none of this is true, but I thought it appropriate to answer these charges and explain the real nature of feminism as a social engineering plot to re-organize and re-engineer mankind by the technocrats.

To understand this, we must see the real players behind “women’s liberation,” dating roughly from the period of the Enlightenment and French Revolution, up to the Paris Commune and in the last century allying with Marxism and socialism to form a global front against the long domination of evil, stupid, and tyrannical men.  As is often the case, the real history and power behind these revolutionary causes was oligarchical and subversive, not at all concerned with the interests of woman in general, but in deconstructing western society at the hands of moneyed elites.

While this sounds counter-intuitive, it is a fact that almost all so-called “liberal” movements have been funded, co-opted, used and harnessed by the money power as a means of psychological warfare for the destruction of the existing order.  Feminism is no exception to this, and like Marxism, had the backing of powerful financial interests which could utilize the “liberation” by appealing to the deluded and naïve ignorance of youth, as the world witnesses with Mao’s cultural revolution. Continue reading

Class Action Lawsuit Claims Purina’s Beneful Dog Food Is Killing Dogs

Want to improve your dog’s diet? Check out these ten well known dog food products. In addition there’s Exqeo, an excellent source for quality information about the best giant breed dog food being marketed today.


PurinaBenefulDogFood

Earlier this month the website Top Class Actions reported that a class action lawsuit has been filed against Nestle Purina Petcare Company alleging that its Beneful dog food includes toxic substances which are capable of killing dogs.

The more than 3,000 complaints against Beneful “show consistent symptoms, including stomach and related internal bleeding, liver malfunction or failure, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, weight loss, seizures, bloating, and kidney failure,” according to Frank Lucido v. Nesltle Purina Petcare Company, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

Lucindo filed the lawsuit on February 5. He owns a Labrador Retriever, an English Bulldog, and a German Shepherd. He bought a bag of Beneful for the first time in late December of 2014 or early January 2015 and began feeding it to his dogs exclusively. Soon after that, all his dogs experienced significant health problems, and one died.

According to the lawsuit, the German Shepherd began to lose a large amount of hair and began giving off a unusual odor on Jan. 15. Two days later it became“violently ill.” 

A veterinarian who examined the dog determined that it was suffering from internal bleeding in its stomach and the liver was also malfunctioning, which the veterinarian said was “consistent with poisoning.” Continue reading