The Latest Mainstream Media’s Fake News Attack Is Quite Serious

That seeming bombshell news story about Trump leaking highly-classified information to the Russians? It’s “fake news,” according to multiple sources who were in the room.

The Washington Post had reported last night that President Trump had shared classified information with Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov last week—which came from a U.S. ally.

National Security Advisor H.R. McMaster unequivocally denied the story: “The story that came out tonight is false,” he told reporters. ‘At no time were intelligence sources or methods discussed,’ he added. ‘And the president did not disclose any military operations that were not already publicly known.’

McMaster elaborated on his denial, adding that “two other senior officials that were present, including the Secretary of State, remembered the meeting the same way and have said so. They’re on-the-record accounts should outweigh those of anonymous sources.”

“I was in the room,” he finished. “It didn’t happen.”

Continue reading

Clinton Email Server Greatest Intel Disaster in History

UehlingerGreg Hunter – Former frontline CIA Officer Scott Uehlinger says Hillary Clinton clearly broke the law with her private unprotected server. Uehlinger explains, “What the Clintons rely on is most Americans don’t really understand the security procedures. So, they can throw up a lot of smoke and mirrors that confuses people and makes them think that this was not so much of a problem. But people in the military and people in the intelligence community understand this better, and certainly it is even worse than it appears. . . .

https://youtu.be/Qas2hc6DIEw

The fact that she set up a private server, in and of itself, means she is guilty of a felony right there. Obviously, by having a private server, she was conspiring to evade her signed sworn statements that she would uphold secrecy agreements. The fact that she simply established that (private server) regardless of what was on it, she intended to go around and circumvent the law. Now, we had more than 100 highly classified emails on the server, and the fact that this server is absolutely vulnerable to any Chinese, Russian or Iranian hacking, this is the greatest disaster or mishandling of classified information at the upper levels of the U.S. government in history. There is no question about it.”

Does Uehlinger think Clinton’s private server was hacked? Uehlinger says, “I would virtually guarantee that with 95% certainty it was hacked. There is almost no question about it.”

Continue reading

Hillary Clinton On The Sanctity Of Protecting Classified Information

classified informationGlenn Greenwald – It turns out that at least two of the emails which traversed Hillary Clinton’s personal email account and server were “top secret,” according to the inspector general for the Intelligence Community as reported by McClatchy. To describe that as reckless is an understatement given that, as AP notes, “There is no evidence she used encryption to shield the emails or her personal server from foreign intelligence services or other potentially prying eyes.” The FBI has now taken possession of that server.

When it comes to low-level government employees with no power, the Obama administration has purposely prosecuted them as harshly as possible to the point of vindictiveness: It has notoriously prosecuted more individuals under the Espionage Act of 1917 for improperly handling classified information than all previous administrations combined. 

NSA whistleblower Tom Drake, for instance, faced years in prison, and ultimately had his career destroyed, based on the Obama DOJ’s claims that he “mishandled” classified information (it included information that was not formally classified at the time but was retroactively decreed to be such). Less than two weeks ago, “a Naval reservist was convicted and sentenced for mishandling classified military materials” despite no “evidence he intended to distribute them.” Last year, a Naval officer was convicted of mishandling classified information also in the absence of any intent to distribute it.

Continue reading