FCC

Fears Continue to Grow Over 5G Safety and Outdated RFR Exposure Limits

~ admin ~ Leave a comment

5g safetyNikki Harper – 5G continues to creep ever closer, but the concerns overs its safety and health risks are not diminishing. Far from it – from scientists the world over, the objections and red flag raising are increasing.

Despite the growing volume of peer-reviewed evidence that 5G is simply not safe, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced in August that it will continue to work on the basis of radiation exposure limits which date to research from the 1980s [1]. This research was mostly concerned with short-term heating risks.

However, since the FCC adopted these limits in the 1990s, more than 500 studies have been published, showing evidence of harmful effects from radio frequency radiation at levels too low to cause heating [2]. Heating is not the issue here. Continue reading →

The Media Is Lying: Trump Is Not Ending Privacy On The Internet. He Is Dismantling A Soros Agenda. [Video]

~ admin ~ Leave a comment

Alexandra Bruce –  Grindall explains how “Net Neutrality” is to the “Internet Freedom and Privacy” as “Obamacare” is to “Affordable Healthcare” as the “PATRIOT Act” is to “Patriotism and honoring the US Constitution”.

The US Government’s names for legislation in recent decades has invariably meant the opposite of what they, in fact enact.

He says that the Mainstream News TOTALLY does not report the facts accurately and as a result, most of us are very misinformed about the March 7, 2017 legislation that overturned so-called “Net Neutrality”. The December 2, 2016 Act has been promoted by NGOs that were financed to the tune of $200M by the Ford Foundation and George Soros, which are fronts for the CIA.

https://youtu.be/XF1QdaDIIT8

Continue reading →

Cell Phone Radiation Varies By Wireless Carrier

~ admin ~ Leave a comment

EWG  November 12 2013

Environmental Working Group

Washington, D.C. – In recent years, a series of studies have shown that a consumer’s choice of wireless carrier may be more important than the cell phone itself in determining how much radiation will reach the user, according to a new analysis by researchers at the Environmental Working Group.

These studies indicate that users of similar mobile devices can be exposed to starkly different intensities of radio frequency emissions, depending on which network technology their carriers use to transmit signals.

“For the many people who want to avoid excessive cell phone radiation, the choice of wireless network is key,” said Renee Sharp, director of research for EWG. “Yet they don’t have enough information to make that decision, because neither the Federal Communications Commission nor the wireless industry makes public critical information about wireless systems’ radiation levels in real-world conditions.”

One important industry-funded study, published in 2010 but based on data collected in 2005 and 2006, showed that AT&T and T-Mobile 2G (second generation) networks that used GSM and TDMA technologies exposed cell phone users to 30 to 300 times more radiation than Verizon and Sprint networks with a technology called CDMA.

Continue reading →