JK Rowling Dares Scotland to Enforce Anti-Free Speech Law

JK Rowling Dares Scotland to Enforce Anti-Free Speech LawJonathan Turley – We have previously discussed the growing anti-free speech movement in Scotland with the expanding criminalization of political and religious speech. The new Scottish law is a perfect nightmare for free speech, expanding the potential of a jail sentence for merely insulting language. In response, author JK Rowling has taken a stand and dared the Scottish police to come and arrest her for criticizing transgender status.

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 illustrates how these laws create a slippery slope of speech criminalization as more and more speech is banned.  We previously discussed the law when it was first introduced. Continue reading

UK Gov’t Officially Labels Shakespeare’s Plays ‘Hate Speech’

UK Gov’t Officially Labels Shakespeare's Plays ‘Hate Speech’Sean Adl-Tabatabai – The British government has declared that William Shakespeare’s work is “racist, sexist, and ableist” and should therefore not be celebrated in schools or theatre’s.

According to a taxpayer funded study by the University of Roehampton, Shakespeare has been disproportionately represented and has enabled “white, able-bodied, heterosexual, cisgender male narratives” to dominate theatre. Andy Kesson, complains that “masculinity and nationalism were crucial motivating factors in the rise of Shakespeare as the arbiter of literary greatness” adding that “[w]e need to be much, much more suspicious of Shakespeare’s place in contemporary theatre.” Continue reading

The Police State Muzzles Our Right to Speak Truth to Power

“If the state could use [criminal] laws not for their intended purposes but to silence those who voice unpopular ideas, little would be left of our First Amendment liberties, and little would separate us from the tyrannies of the past or the malignant fiefdoms of our own age. The freedom to speak without risking arrest is ‘one of the principal characteristics by which we distinguish a free nation.’”—Justice Neil Gorsuch, dissenting, Nieves v. Bartlett (2019)

How the Police State Muzzles Our Right to Speak Truth to PowerJohn W. Whitehead – Tyrants don’t like people who speak truth to power.

Cue the rise of protest laws, which take the government’s intolerance for free speech to a whole new level and send the resounding message that resistance is futile.

In fact, ever since the Capitol protests on Jan. 6, 2021, state legislatures have introduced a broad array of these laws aimed at criminalizing protest activities. Continue reading

Censorship Is a Dead-End Road

Censorship Is a Dead-End RoadJ.B. Shurk – During oral arguments before the Supreme Court in Murthy v. Missouri — a dispute that Senator Rand Paul rightly calls “the most consequential free speech case in U.S. history” — Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed concern that the First Amendment is “hamstringing the government in significant ways, in the most important time periods.”

As with so much of the U.S. Constitution — and specifically the Bill of Rights — that has gotten in the way of the federal government’s march toward absolute power, a foundational American right is now in jeopardy. A member of the highest court in the land would rather destroy what’s left of the people’s withering protections against tyranny than admit that the government’s authority has limits.

Continue reading

Canada’s Online Harms Act: Assault on Free Speech

Canada’s Online Harms Act: Assault on Free SpeechAnthony Murdoch – One of Canada’s leading pro-freedom constitutional groups warned that the federal government’s Online Harms Act is a dangerous piece of legislation that is not only an “assault” on free speech but will be used to take away “basic rights” by allowing the return of “Kangaroo courts.”

“The Online Harms Act (Bill C-63) is the most aggressive assault against free speech in modern Canadian history,” the Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms (JCCF) posted Monday on X.

“If passed into law, the Act will expose you, along with every other Canadian, to being prosecuted by the Canadian Human Rights Commission over anything you say that someone else might view as ‘hateful.’” Continue reading