Mandatory Vaccinations Afoot: Medical Fascism Approaching Fast

vaccinationsMakia Freeman – Mandatory vaccinations are afoot as California has just achieved the horrific distinction of becoming the first state in the US to introduce compulsory vaccinations for both children and adults (bills SB277 and SB792 respectively). This goes to show that the NWO (New World Order) agenda of collectivism and medical fascism is fast approaching. There is no more time to sit on the fence, debate things intellectually or hide behind the excuse that certain agendas and events are just unprovable conspiracies. Suddenly it’s getting pretty real. By introducing mandatory vaccinations, the Government is essentially claiming it owns your body, it knows best when it comes to medicine and health, that the science behind vaccines is settled, and that it has the right to violate you if it deems in doing do that it’s “protecting the greater good”. How many people out there still consider that the Government forcibly injecting you with at least 10 toxic and carcinogenic vaccine adjuvants (such as mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde, diploid cells from aborted fetal tissue, MSG, etc.) is not a violation?

Australia and Other Nations Also on Road to Mandatory Vaccinations

The Rockefeller Medicine-Big Pharma-NWO push towards mandatory vaccinations is unfortunately not limited to the USA. It’s worldwide. In April I wrote about how Australia, sadly, was following lockstep in the footprints of the US and becoming GMO and Vaccine Australia. In attempting to boost the immunization rate, the Australian Government removed religious exemptions for vaccines, bribed (“incentivized”) doctors to inject more of their patients and financially punished people by tightening up welfare eligibility for parents who fail to vaccinate their children. Other nations that already have mandatory vaccination laws (either at a state or federal level) include Malaysia, Latvia, Slovenia and Croatia.

WHO Can Order Mandatory Vaccinations in All 194 Signatory Nations

To those who have been following the unfolding of the New World Order, it is also unsurprising that the WHO (World Health Organization), another subsidiary of the Rockefeller-created UN (United Nations), has laws on its books to be able to declare mandatory vaccinations in all its 194 signatory states. As Jane Burgermeister reports: Continue reading

Herd Immunity vs. Viral Shedding: Who’s Infecting Whom?

herd immunityMakia Freeman – Herd immunity, or community immunity as it is also known, is one of the main arguments that “pro-vaxxers” (those advocating vaccination) advance to persuade people to take vaccines. Herd immunity, so it is claimed, provides indirect protection to the unvaccinated. How? Here’s how the reasoning goes: if enough people get vaccinated, when a contagious disease hits a community, it spreads less quickly than if the majority were not vaccinated, since they are now protected. Thus, those unvaccinated few living among the vaccinated many can now enjoy some protection because the disease is finding it harder to spread and infect new individuals. This argument has many assumptions and flaws, as we shall see.

Interestingly enough, in recent times a concept that is essentially the opposite of herd immunity – i.e. viral shedding – has been in the news. You see, people using the argument of herd immunity generally claim that the unvaccinated help speed the spread of a disease, even encompassing those who got vaccinated. In other words, the unvaccinated can infect the vaccinated. The phenomenon of viral shedding, on the other hand, is showing that those who get vaccines get the virus in their body – even if it’s weak or attenuated – and the virus then sheds, can become contagious and can start spreading. In other words, the vaccinated can infect the unvaccinated. So which is the more true concept: herd immunity or viral shedding? Who’s infecting whom?

Vaccine-Induced Herd Immunity is Full of Assumptions

To get to the bottom of this question, you need to take a close look at this notion of herd immunity. It contains the following assumptions: Continue reading

GMO Vaccines Creating “Herd Contagion”

What Is Herd Immunity?

EugenicsVaccinesHerd immunity has been misunderstood when applied to animal herds and was always a false concept when applied to vaccinated groups.

  1. Herd immunity referred to natural immunity acquired by a herd of animals, that is, immunity acquired over time as animals in a herd got exposed to a disease and more and more individuals developed permanent immunity to it.  When enough animals in a herd  developed that natural immunity one could say, in a general way, that the herd had an immunity to the disease.  This was versus another herd with less exposure and fewer members with natural defenses.  Individuals in the first herd could still potentially catch the disease but “herd immunity” meant the disease would not run rampant since most of the animals had been exposed previously.In summary, herd immunity is thus a kind of comparative description of groups of animals that had already gotten the disease (naturally) versus groups that had not (those didn’t collectively have much immunity).
  2. When used to describe vaccination of groups the fallacy of herd immunity doubles.  First, vaccines do not confer permanent immunity. In any group, vaccine “immunization” would always be wearing off for large numbers of the members of the group. Second, vaccines skew the immune system toward an inferior form of immunity, actually making those vaccinated  more susceptible to disease.

Vaccines increase susceptibility to disease

This greater susceptibility to disease after vaccination is increasingly confirmed.

With flu shots, the person’s risk of getting the flu is doubled if they had previously been vaccinated for it.  In addition, the indications in a ferret study (below) is that the vaccinated group became much sicker when they got the disease than those who got it but had not been vaccinated.

According to the Vancouver Sun:1

“Researchers, led by Vancouver’s Dr. Danuta Skowronski, an influenza expert at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control, noticed in the early weeks of the [2009 H1N1] pandemic that people who got a flu shot for the 2008-09 winter seemed to be more likely to get infected with the pandemic virus than people who hadn’t received a flu shot. Five studies done in several provinces showed the same unsettling results.”

In March last year, ABC News reported:2 Continue reading