Anthony Gucciardi ~ Leak: US Using Taxpayer Dollars To Promote Monsanto GMOs Overseas

Natural Society May 15 2013

Just when you thought the latest Supreme Court ruling in favor of Monsanto’s anti-farmer patent policy was enough evidence of Monsanto’s deep relationship with the US government, hundreds of new cables from the State Department and embassies around the world reveal that your taxpayer dollars are being used to push Monsanto’s genetically modified seeds.

Even mainstream news websites like Reuters are now reporting on the cable details, as it becomes more than crystal clear that the United States government is literally assisting Monsanto in promoting it’s health-crushing genetically modified seeds and escalating the corporation above the law. The same corporation busted for running slave-like work rings where ‘employees’ were required to work on the GMO corn fields for up to 14 hours a day or have their pay withheld.

Continue reading

Daniel McAdams ~ MeK De-Listing: Washington Openly Embraces Terrorism

IntelHub | September 23 2012

That the “war on terror” is a sick, manipulative joke cannot be more clearly demonstrated by the decision of the US State Department yesterday to remove the Marxist-Islamist death and murder cult, Mujahedeen Khalq (MeK), from the US terror list.

As Glenn Greenwald pointed out earlier this year, the MeK is jointly funded and trained by Israeli and US intelligence to carry out murder and mayhem inside Iran against civilian targets.

It is the murderous and violent vanguard of the US and Israeli war against Iran.

It launders money from Israel and the US through US politicians who on one side of their mouths scream about the need to fight terrorism while on the other they accept millions to lobby for one of the most brutal and bizarre terrorist cults on earth.

When these criminal politicians start speaking about the “war against terrorism” spit on your television screen, as they are the terrorists.

They are wealthy terrorists who steal your tax dollars to send overseas and recoup to lobby in favor of bloody killers of civilians in Iran.

Continue reading

Jim Stone ~ Slogging Through The Pit Of Lies

Jim Stone | September 15 2012

This evolving article fleshes out Jim’s concerns in more detail and asks some interesting questions ~G

Benghazi
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/interactive/2012/sep/13/us-consulate-attack-benghazi-interactive

Jim writes . . . After spending hours on the topic of the “Islamic uprising”, I have hit a wall of frustration. The conflicting B.S. coming out of the media with regard to this topic has made it impossible to get a solid stab at the monster. Here is what I know for sure at this time:

  1. There is no great Islamic uprising occurring, especially over a movie which is now proven to not exist.
  2. It appears from the photos of the Sydney protest that it was staged. I am going to be making a few calls today to get what people on the ground there are saying.
  3. There is no Benghazi consulate. Instead, someone rented a very nice home on the outskirts of town and trashed it. This would be Mossad all the way. None of the stories match, so many different versions of this story are out there, even in the “official” press that it is obvious there is no root of truth to any of it. There are way to many obvious conflicts here to post and have people read through. In short,

A. The “embassy vehicle” is not an embassy vehicle. The Ambassador came from an embassy. The U.S. embassies, especially in hostile areas, and Libya would be one, always send diplomats around in armored cars with bullet proof glass. What is burned up in the photos is just an ordinary civilian car with normal glass. And if it is not the one the “diplomat” used to get there, where is his car?

B. I and others at this site managed to pull up articles related to the previous test run wag the dog regarding this “consulate”. One of these articles stated that the “consulate” opened in 2011, yet no where on the Department of State web site was this “consulate” listed.And the press is being careful to label it as “temporary” so they can maintain the excuse that it is not in any record. But 2011? If it was there since 2011 according to an Australian newspaper, well, it’s September 2012 now, exactly what do they call “temporary?”

C. None of the photos show a consulate. They show a fancy house. And not just any fancy house. According to the scale provided by the guardian, the house is approximately 10,000 square feet, and has an additional 3,000 square foot extension. So at this “consulate”, which as a “consulate” would need a maximum of 2,000 square feet to function, we have 13,000 square feet, and a total of 4 people who arrived in one car temporarily “staffing” it. Yeah. Right. Such an enormous size would spaciously employ at least 125 people in their own 100 square foot office. Where are the rest of them? If over 9 months is not enough to get people there to staff it, especially in a country where you would want it staffed, how much time is enough? Why would any “consulate” be so freaking huge? That alone is bullshit.

D. In one of the stories, we have mortars. In another, we have “it burned to the ground” (a flat impossibility, it was concrete). In another story, we have it got flamed. That definitely did happen, but what about the other two stories? Where are the holes in the concrete from it getting shelled?

E. And, why is there a washing machine thrown into the swimming pool? Why is there trash strewn everywhere? Where is the flag pole? Is 9 months not enough to put one in? Where is the consulate placard, that all consulates have? Would a mob take the time to trash the place thoroghly in such a way? Folks, there is not even a temporary flag holder on the front, a requirement for any embassy or consulate. There is no trashed office furniture, no smashed office equipment, and if the looters were there to steal, why is a fancy front load washer at the bottom of the pool? That alone proves the place did not get robbed, so where is the rest stuff it should have? It would not have burned in it’s entireity, the governement uses too much metal office equipment, and what about the metal shells the computers would have had?

Continue reading