Tag Archives: Washington DC

Andy Hoffman ~ The Belly Of The Beast [Audio]

I just returned from a one week visit to the belly of the Beast: Washington DC. Andy Hoffman from Miles Franklin joins us to discuss the NWO influences over our Republic. In this interview we also cover the latest in gold, silver & economic developments around the world including the Australian government now seizing “dormant” bank accounts. Add to the mix the Southern border crisis in the US and the implosion of Iraq and Ukraine — and it’s more than the average person can track. Thanks for tuning in.

Paul Rosenberg ~ Bribery In America

” The department that handles the most money can skim off the most to you. For example, the best donations in the US House of Representatives always went to the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee. Why? Because that committee put together the budget for the whole US government. Own some of that man, and you can dip your hand into the money stream at the headwaters.” ~Paul Rosenberg

briberyI know something about bribery. When I was a teenager, my dad was in the construction business in Chicago. So, as soon as I got my driver’s license (at 16), I was sent out delivering bribes. That’s just the way things were done, and my dad let me drive a fancy car (with an FM radio!) to make the deliveries.

I delivered leather coats to wives, envelopes to government offices, other envelopes to politicians at their fundraisers, booze to lots of people, and in one case, the answers to the state driver’s exam to a guy in… um… a different line of work.

I extricated myself from these chores fairly quickly. Aside from the cool car, it made me uncomfortable. These escapades did, however, give me a fairly good understanding of how bribery in America works.

Big League Bribery

Most of the bribery I did as a kid was fairly mundane – minor league stuff. The one exception was the political fundraiser. That was big league bribery. Following explicit orders, I dressed up and stood in a greeting line for as long as it took to come face to face with the politician. I handed him the envelope and told him precisely who it was from. I shook his hand and he told me to please enjoy the buffet. I thanked him, then stepped away. Continue reading

Thomas R. Eddlem ~ IRS Scandal: It Wasn’t Just Cincinnati (and May Involve Other Federal Agencies)

The New American May 29 2013

L:ois Lerner 

The Obama administration’s key defense in the IRS scandal is falling apart. Up until now, the administration has relied upon the implicit claim that IRS targeting of conservative groups applying for non-profit status was simply the actions of a few rogue agents in the Cincinnati office of the IRS. But it is increasingly clear that the targeting of conservatives was directed from Washington, as multiple IRS offices have now been shown to have been involved in such efforts.

NBC News reported May 28, “Additional scrutiny of conservative organizations’ activities by the IRS did not solely originate in the agency’s Cincinnati office, with requests for information coming from other offices and often bearing the signatures of higher-ups at the agency, according to attorneys representing some of the targeted groups.” Reporting by the local Fox News affiliate has also belied the White House’s claim. And the conservative website the Daily Caller has identified at least five different offices of the IRS that targeted conservatives.

The signature of director of the IRS Exempt Organizations division Lois Lerner was on at least some of the letters demanding broad submission of information to the IRS from conservative organizations. Lerner — who was placed on administrative leave with pay last week after pleading the Fifth Amendment in congressional hearings — was based out of Washington. So her signature on letters of inquiry to conservative groups thoroughly debunks the White House party line.

Jay Sekulow, an attorney representing 27 conservative political advocacy organizations that applied to the IRS for tax-exempt status, provided some of the letters to NBC News. “We’ve dealt with 15 agents, including tax law specialists — that’s lawyers — from four different offices, including [the] Treasury [Department] in Washington, D.C.,” Sekulow told NBC News. “So the idea that this is a couple of rogue agents in Cincinnati is not correct.”

Continue reading

David Icke ~ State Of The Union? …

David Icke Newsletter February 15 2013

… It’s Behind Him

The great Chinese philosopher Confucius (551-479 BC) said: ‘Signs and symbols rule the world, not words nor laws.’ There is a reason for this.

When people speak they are transmitting a vibrating information field generated by the vocal chords. These vibrations are picked up by the ears of the receiver and transmitted electrically to the brain to be decoded into words.

Everything is an information field and so it is with symbols. They are information fields that represent what they are meant to symbolise and they are transmitted to the brain through the visual senses (through which 80 per cent of the information the brain employs to construct reality is sourced).

The difference is that when we hear sound such as words our conscious mind is aware of that, but when the information fields that we call symbols access the brain they do so subconsciously. Even if one or two register with the conscious mind only a few people realise what they represent and are covertly communicating. It is all happening subconsciously.

In short, symbols are a secret gateway to the human mind.

The bloodline families know this and that’s why they have their own language of symbolism and why they place their symbols throughout human society. Continue reading

Alfred Lambremont Webre, JD, MEd ~ Is Earth On A Positive Timeline, 2013-2020?

Exopolitics 

FIGURE.1.NASA.SOHO.JULY.4.2012.Triangular.portal.UFO

FIGURE I – NASA/SOHO. Sun. Giant Triangular Stargate for UFOs, July 4, 2012

Is Earth on a positive timeline, 2013-2020?

How extraterrestrial civilizations may be shielding Earth from catastrophic damage by solar storms

Two independent science-based probes provide some, although not definitive, evidence to support a possible catastrophic timeline for Earth in 2013 and the near term future.

A 1971 U.S. Department of Defense DARPA chronovisor time travel probe to the year 2013 found the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, DC under 100 feet of brackish water.

In a 2010 Farsight Institute remote viewing probe of June 2013 using the largest number of military-trained remote viewers in history, 39% of the military-trained remove viewers found a global coastal event and devastated coastal cities and populations, with the U.S. Capitol (directly across the street from the U.S. Supreme Court) being devastated and by deep water, congruent with the 1971 DARPA chronovisor probe of 2013.

A positive time line

Neither of these two studies is definitive, however.  The results of the 2010 Farsight Institute probe of June 2013 are skewed between a 2013 “catastrophic” timeline and a 2013 “non-catastrophic” timeline. Statistically, 39 percent of the remote viewing reports achieved a disaster score of “3” (Catastrophic), while 29% of the remote viewing reports achieved a disaster score of “0” (Non-catastrophic).  In my opinion, if the Farsight Institute remote viewing study is valid, it is statistically almost as much a certainty that a non-catastrophic (positive) future envisioned by 29% of the remote viewers will occur in 2012-13 as that the catastrophic timeline envisioned by 39% of remote viewers will occur.

The 1971 DARPA chronovisor probe of 2013 is uncertain as well, according to Andrew D. Basiago, the former U.S. chrononaut who participated in that probe.  According to Mr. Basiago, “Because the chronovisors did not identify absolute, deterministic futures but rather alternate futures in the ‘multi-verse,’ this catastrophic vision of Washington, DC might be from an alternative time line that does not materialize on our time line.”  All time travel to the past by child participants had been halted in the early 1970s because “each time a child time traveled to the past, she/he found a different result”. This, Mr. Basiago said, could be indicative of alternative and differing timelines.

Deep Underground Military Bases (DUMBS)

Continue reading

Dreama Vance ~ God Is Not Abraham Lincoln

Infinite Being | January 13 2012

Perhaps you remember hearing about the little boy who started the Lord’s Prayer, “Our Father, which art in Heaven, Howard be thy name…” instead of “hallowed be thy name.”

Children often surprise and delight us with their ability to take words and information they don’t understand and “fix it” so that it fits into a construct that makes sense in their world. As a child, I was no exception.

When I was little and went to church and Sunday school, I heard about “the throne of God” and how Jesus “sat at the right hand of God.”

At the same time in elementary school, we learned about Abraham Lincoln, one of our most famous and important American presidents. We were shown pictures of him memorialized by the huge Lincoln Memorial in Washington DC.

Both teachings were larger than life and inspired great awe and respect. Because there was actually a picture of this great person, Lincoln, on a throne (it looked like a throne to me), my mind quite naturally juxtaposed God there also.

So this was my image of God. God was Abraham Lincoln sitting on his throne. For years, when God was mentioned, I automatically saw Abraham Lincoln in that chair.

Now, obviously at some point in time my misunderstanding got straightened out. However, it took decades before I began to understand God is not a Him or a Her or a being or a person, no matter how great a person. The reason this took so long to figure out is because many churches continue to teach the concept of God as being separate from us.

Many of us have expanded our understanding of the concepts of God through metaphysical teachings. We now “know” God by many other names: The Absolute, the Tao, the Creator, All That Is, Consciousness, Energy, The Universe. We also know, to some degree, that God dwells within us.

Continue reading

Pastor Roger Anghis ~ The Banning Of Guns

NewsWithViews | December 30 2012

America is #1 in individual arms possession and we have the lowest per capita murder rate of any nation in the world considering the amount of arms the individuals own

The Violation of our 2nd Amendment

When John Kennedy was assassinated in 1963 the calls for gun control began to rise. In 1968 Martin Luther King was assassinated and the fires were stoked again. Then Robert Kennedy was assassinated and the calls to ban guns went into high gear. The liberal left has the idea that if guns were banned then there wouldn’t be any guns in the hands of criminals. The problem with that is that is why they are called criminals, they don’t obey the laws.

The real reason about the so-called ‘gun control’ isn’t about gun control but completely about control. All evidence concerning the banning of guns and the reduction of crime points to a drastic rise in crime when guns are banned. Look at these facts. Chicago, Washington, D.C. and New York City would be the safest places in the world, if that theory was correct. In 2012 Chicago ranked number one in the world for alpha cities for violent death using guns. Chicago has the strictest gun laws in the country yet they have 19.4 deaths per 100,000 due to gun violence. Last year 440 children of school age were shot, 60 of them dying. We decry the violence in Connecticut, as we should, but say nothing about the violence banning guns creates.

Think about this, how many criminals using guns got to a gun-free school or theater and saw the gun free sign and said, ‘Now what do I do?’ No, they chose the gun free zone because they knew that no one would be firing back at them. We have to remember that Sandy Nook, the Aurora theater, Virginia Tech and Columbine are all gun free zones. Even our military bases are gun-free zones which is why Hassan was able to kill 13 people and wound 29 others. There were laws in place but the criminal broke the law. Remember that is what criminals do. They don’t pay attention to the laws and any more gun laws that restrict gun ownership will also be ignored by the criminals. How do they think that taking away the ability for the innocent to protect themselves, by restricting gun ownership, does anything other than force them to be victims?

Here are some statistics on the relationship of gun ownership to gun violence in the United States. The United States rates number 1 of 178 in the world in personal gun ownership according to gunpolicy.org. There are 88.8 guns per 100 persons in America. The number of gun deaths per 100,000 in population in 2009 was 2.98.

In China the average citizen in not allowed to own a gun yet in 2008 14,811 people were killed using guns. This is a nation where the average citizen is not allowed to own a gun and the number of deaths exceeded Americas rate where there are 88.8 guns per 100 people. The number of registered guns in China in .05 per 100. It is obvious that it is not the number of guns but in whose hands those guns are in.

Canada has very strict guns laws and regulations. As an example an officer of the Court of Appeal of Ontario describes what he had to go through in purchasing a shotgun. “Buying a shotgun required me to attend a weekend long Canadian Firearms Acquisition Course (cost: $320), then apply to the RCMP for a Possession and Acquisition License, submit to a thorough background search, have my three references interviewed and an RCMP officer attend at my house to investigate my means of storage – a separate safe for the gun and ammo AND a trigger lock. Then, a 28-day waiting period.” He went on to state that as a practicing attorney in Toronto for 20 years he was never involved in a case where a criminal used a legal gun in a crime. That is another fact that the left seems to ignore and that is that almost all guns used in crimes were illegal, stolen, black market, etc.

Continue reading

John Moffett ~ Can Corporations Convince California Voters That They Don’t Want To Know What’s In Their Food?

OpEd News | November 5 2012

J. Moffett

California’s Proposition 37, also known as the “California Right to Know Genetically Engineered Food Act”, will be on the ballot this Tuesday for Californians to decide if they want to know what is in the foods they eat. Proposition 37 would require that many food products that contain genetically modified plants such as GMO corn be labeled so that consumers know what they and their families are eating. The Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), a Washington DC based trade association of major food manufacturers, has made it their top priority to defeat Proposition 37 this November. As a result, many agribusiness, chemical and food industry corporations are donating large sums of money to defeat proposition 37, including companies like Monsanto (over 8 million dollars), Dupont companies (over 5 million dollars), PepsiCo (over 2 million dollars), Kraft (over 1.6 million dollars) and even Smucker’s ($485,000). The big question for these companies is — can they spend enough money on negative advertising to get 51% of California voters to say they would much rather not know what is in their food?

Genetically modified organisms (GMO) are technically known as transgenic organisms because a gene from one organism has been artificially inserted into the genome of another. It’s a big deal for agribusiness because they have become dependent upon companies like Monsanto to ostensibly reduce their costs by making crops temporarily resistant to insects and weeds. Setting aside discussions on any actual cost savings or increased crop yields for farmers, it is a documented fact that insect and weed species adapt to the new crop and field conditions within several generations. As soon as the new, modified plant is grown in large monoculture conditions the insects and weeds immediately begin the process of mutation and selection to generate naturally resistant versions. At best you can expect perhaps 10 years before substantial resistance becomes widespread in some insect and weed species populations. Then the process must be repeated with the development of a new transgenic plant variety. It should be noted that as in the case of overuse of antibiotics and the development of antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria that it is the overuse of Roundup that leads to the development of resistant insect and weed varieties. However, the use of Roundup resistant crop varieties by large agribusiness strongly encourages repeated heavy application of glyphosate substantially increasing the glyphosate levels in the resultant food products, and accelerating the development of resistant weeds.

Continue reading