Trump Seals JFK Documents Until 2021

The Millenial Report – Some 15,884 records that have now been partially released, some with heavy redactions, will be subject to yet more review over the next three years under Trump’s order

President Trump is certainly kowtowing to many Deep State demands for very good reasons.  The comment posted below the line by Zaphod Braden conveys the single most important reason why President John F. Kennedy was assassinated by the Israeli government and its numerous co-conspirators.

Israel’s Direct Connection to the JFK Assassination

There is now no question that the CIA oversaw the JFK public execution plan, but it was Israel that got the ball rolling. See Operation Zipper: The CIA’s Highly Organized Conspiracy to Assassinate President John F. Kennedy

Former CIA Director Allen Dulles actually coordinated the assassination scheme in Dallas from his makeshift headquarters at The Farm.  JFK assassination evidence and cover-up points to the former C.I.A. Director as the black operation overseer. – The Millennium Report
April 29, 2018

Zaphod Braden – Trump putting Israel First ….. Continue reading

Trump is not JFK, nor is it his destiny to have the same fate

trumpState of the Nation – President John F. Kennedy was literally the smartest guy in the room. Everyone knew that and took his words very seriously. So, when he spoke about secret societies, who didn’t listen… very closely? When JFK vowed to“splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces and scatter it into the winds”[1] who didn’t take him seriously?

These and other extremely courageous actions by Kennedy are what sealed his fate in Dallas on November 22, 1963.

Now fast forward to 2017.

President Donald J. Trump is also the smartest guy on the block, yet in his own very unique way. He has street smarts that Kennedy lacked. But what Trump really has going for him is his confounding and unpredictable persona. His hard New York City edge and inimitable moxie only add to the mix. Continue reading

Sartre ~ State Sponsored Assassination Culture

“Sorrowfully, government officials are locked into a denial mindset that disassociates any relationship and connection between increased levels of risks to officials and the sanctioned killings approved by their governments.” – Sartre

Obama_US_DronesThe ongoing failures of the Secret Service to provide proper protection for the President have political careerists in a tizzy. Scares that harm could come to the commander-in-chief, also worries the press. Ordinary citizens on principle, accept that the White House should be secure grounds. Rotating blame usually means that the buck does not stop on the oval office desk. Indeed, who could expect any President to be responsible for their own safety? Surely, policy decisions made as a government could not possibly have any bearing on the lunatics that harbor ill will towards our fearless leaders.

Refreshing your memory, Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, William McKinley and John F. Kennedy got whacked. Andrew Jackson, Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Gerald Ford and Ronald Reagan were targets of serious assassination attempts.

With all the Secret Service trial and tribulations experienced in the last years, the popular assessment is that the Praetorian Guard bodyguards have become a dysfunctional band of self-indulgent thrill seekers.

How much money is enough to spend on Presidential security? Some like ousted Secret Service Director Julia Pierson presumably would say a price tag cannot be placed on keeping the leader alive and safe from assassination. Though, Pierson failed to provide fresh start for Secret Service that administration wanted, proves that the culture of political privilege deems their importance to be most costly. Continue reading

Victor Thorn ~ Executive Orders: Their Use And Abuse By Many U.S. Presidents

American Free Press | August 22 2102

President Barack Obama is following on the heels of previous presidents such as Bill Clinton and George W. Bush, whose disdain for constitutional checks and balance was often evident in the flurry of executive orders (EOs) and presidential decision directives (PDDs) signed in an effort to get around Congress.

Once used as a way to establish schedules for executive office employees or to help agencies under the White House carry out their duties, EOs and PDDs are increasingly being used as a means to bypass the due process of proper legislation.

Through these, Obama is following the precedent set by his predecessors, bypassing the legislative process and instead relying on making up the rules himself through various governmental agencies and hand-selected czars. And while Obama, who has issued 134 EOs, does not hold a candle to past presidents like FDR, who issued an incredible 3,522 EOs, or Woodrow Wilson, who signed 1,807 EOs, his use is pushing the bounds for which they were originally intended.

By comparison, George Washington issued eight EOs, and Thomas Jefferson signed only four.

In Obama’s case, his views about the proper role Congress should play in creating or challenging laws were made clear in a March 6 press conference when he said:

“If Congress refuses to act, I’ve said that I’ll continue to do everything in my power to act without them.”

For instance, since Congress wouldn’t pass a cap-and-trade environmental bill, he used the Environmental Protection Agency to make its own rules through the Clean Air Act. Cap and trade refers to a complicated system that involves setting pre-determined limits on carbon emissions produced by factories.

When the American people resisted the DREAM Act, Obama turned to an executive order that granted blanket immunity for a million illegal aliens. And rather than going to Congress to get approval under the War Powers Act prior to last year’s Libyan invasion, the White House went to the UN to get approval for war.

But while Obama’s frequent use of EOs is not unprecedented, the scope of the new  rules he makes pushes the envelope for just how far a president can go in making his own decrees.

Continue reading

Paul Craig Roberts ~ Disinformation On Every Front

Paul Craig Roberts | May 4 2012

ChinaSome readers have come to the erroneous conclusion that the Matrix consists of Republican Party disinformation as if there is no disinformation from the left. Others think that propaganda is the business of Obama and the Democrats. In fact, propaganda from the right, the left and the middle are all part of the disinformation fed to americans.

If I may give some examples: The other day Chuck Colson, one of the Nixon officials imprisoned for Watergate crimes, died. This gave NPR the opportunity to relive the Nixon horror.

What precisely was the Nixon horror? Essentially, there was no such thing. Watergate was about President Nixon lying about when he learned about the Watergate burglary.
When Nixon learned about the burglary, he did not act on it prior to his reelection, because he reasoned, rightly, that the Washington Post would blame him for the burglary, although he had nothing to do with it, in the hopes of preventing his reelection.

By going along with a cover-up, Nixon enabled the Washington Post to make an issue of the precise date on which Nixon learned of the burglary. White House tapes indicated that Nixon had learned of the burglary before he said he learned of it. So Nixon had permitted a cover-up and had to go, but what was the real reason?

What was the Watergate burglary? We don’t really know. A group of men including former CIA operatives were hired by the Committee to Re-elect the President to break into a Democratic campaign office in the Watergate complex. We don’t know the purpose of the burglary. Some claim it was to wire-tap the telephones in the belief that the Democratic Party was getting re-election money from communists in Cuba or elsewhere. Others claim that the burglars were looking for a list of call girls, that compromised a White House official, as his fiancee was allegedly one of the call girls.

Looking back from our time during which Bush and Obama have deep-sixed the US Constitution, violated numerous US and international laws, and behaved as if they were caesars unconstrained by any law or any morality, Nixon’s “crimes” appear so trivial as to be unremarkable. Yet, Nixon was driven from office and is regarded as a criminal.

What was Watergate really about?

Continue reading