magnetic fields

Creating And Destroying Magnetic Fields At A Distance

~ admin ~ Leave a comment

magneticJoseph P Farrell – P.S.J. spotted and shared this story, and it’s definitely in the “whopper doozie” category. First, a bit of basics (which are covered in the article). We all know magnets (or electrical coils) can set up a magnetic field around them. Put bluntly, no coil or magnet, no magnetic field. The corollary of this is that while magnetic fields can exist in space, they have to have source, where the field strength will be greatest. With that, let’s turn to the story P.S.J. spotted:

Physicists could do the ‘impossible’: Create and destroy magnetic fields from afar

Here’s the essence of the technique: Continue reading →

Scientists Discover Humans Have A ‘Magnetic 6th Sense’ To Detect Something We Can’t Even See

~ admin ~ Leave a comment

magnetic fieldsArjun Walia – It’s called magnetoreception, and it refers to the ability to perceive magnetic fields. Several animals use it to find their way over long distances by aligning themselves with the Earth’s magnetic field. Sea turtles. honeybees, spiny lobsters, dolphins, migratory birds, and more all have a magnetic compass which allows them to use the information that’s coded into magnetic fields.

We know little beyond that, however. How they use them, how they sense them, and what information they are getting from them remains up for speculation. For all we know, these magnetic fields could be used for much more than navigation for certain species.

According to Joe Kirschvink, the geophysicist at the California Institute of Technology who is currently testing humans for a magnetic sense, “it’s part of our evolutionary history. Magnetoreception  may be the primal sense.” (source) Continue reading →

Earthquakes And The Sun

~ admin ~ Leave a comment

magnetic fieldsJoseph P Farrell – For quite some time I’ve had the wild idea that our habits of thinking about physical systems are all wrong, namely, that we tend to think of every system as a kind of closed phenomenon, having no impact or influence upon other systems. It’s out human habit: to analyze something we tend to break it off from the context in which it occurs, rather than look at the context itself as a contributing factor to the phenomenon or phenomena we wish to analyze.

Systems are usually open systems rather than closed ones, interacting with other systems that might not even be “local” in the conventional sense. I’m by no means alone in this view: the internet has been alive with amateur “systems watchers” for some time, trying to correlate data from a variety of systems to see if patterns emerge, say for example, severe weather or geophysical activity coordinated to when HAARP or EISCAT or other ionopsheric heaters are active; others look at strange magnetosphere effects and try to correlate these to the operations of Cern’s Large Hadron Collider, and so on.

I’ve gone so far as to propose that one should look at aggregate human behavior – and even memories – and try to correlate these to some of these other systems like the collider and so on, or that one should look carefully at planetary events as part of the larger system of the Earth-Sun system. Continue reading →